Wire EDM and Sinker EDM solve geometry that cutting tools can’t.
When a CNC end mill can’t reach a deep rib, a thin wall chatters, or a hardened blank risks scrap, EDM becomes the safer path. But “EDM” is not one process. Wire EDM and Sinker (die-sinker) EDM behave differently, drive cost differently, and fit different features—especially in hardened steels and tooling components.
This guide shows how to choose the right EDM method, how to design parts so they quote cleanly, and what to include in an RFQ to protect lead time and quality.

Which EDM should you use?
Use Wire EDM for accurate through-cut profiles, and use Sinker EDM for cavities and blind 3D shapes. If you’re building tooling or working with hardened steel where rework risk is high, a hybrid workflow (CNC + heat treat + EDM finishing) is usually the most predictable.
For hybrid jobs, treat EDM as the precision “finishing step” after efficient CNC roughing and semi-finishing—this is often the fastest way to get tight-tolerance machined parts without scrapping expensive hardened blanks. If you need a reliable prototype-to-production path, start with a DFM-led plan for custom CNC machining parts, then lock the process with clear datums, a First Article Inspection report, and the surface-finish requirements that matter most.

Choose Wire EDM when you need accurate through-cut profiles?
Wire EDM is the go-to when your feature is a “cut line” that goes all the way through a part.
Typical examples:
-
Punches, dies, and plates with complex outlines
-
Precision slots, keyways, and internal profiles that must stay straight
-
Laminations, shims, and parts where distortion from cutting forces is a concern
Wire EDM is also a common way to finish hardened components after heat treat, because it does not rely on mechanical cutting forces.
Choose Sinker EDM when you need cavities, blind pockets, and 3D shapes
Sinker EDM excels when the feature is a cavity (often blind) and the shape is defined by an electrode.
Typical examples:
-
Deep ribs in mold inserts and tooling
-
Blind cavities with sharp internal corners
-
Complex 3D pockets that are difficult to mill in hardened steel
If your design looks like “a pocket that an end mill can’t reach,” sinker EDM should be on the shortlist.
Use CNC plus heat treat plus EDM for tooling and high-risk hardened parts
If you need both efficient material removal and extreme features, split the job.
A common approach is:
1) CNC rough and semi-finish in the soft state
2) Heat treat (if required)
3) EDM to create/finish the difficult features
4) Finish grind or polish on functional surfaces (if needed)
5) Inspect to the right datums and critical features
This sequence reduces tool wear, reduces risk of deformation, and makes quality control more predictable.

What is EDM, and why engineers use it for hard materials?
EDM (Electrical Discharge Machining) removes metal using controlled electrical sparks between an electrode and the workpiece in a dielectric fluid. Because it does not use a cutting edge pushing against the material, EDM can machine features in hard alloys that would be difficult, risky, or slow with conventional cutting.

The core idea is controlled sparks with no cutting force
In EDM, the electrode and the workpiece never “cut” in the traditional sense.
Instead, the machine controls spark energy and the gap between the electrode and the part. Each spark locally melts/vaporizes a tiny amount of material, and the dielectric helps flush debris away.
This matters for difficult parts because:
-
Thin sections are less likely to deflect from tool pressure
-
Hardened steel is less of a “tool wear” problem than in milling
-
Very small features can be created without tiny cutters snapping
What hardened-steel friendly really means in real production?
EDM is often used on hardened steel, but it’s not magic.
You still need to manage:
-
Surface integrity (recast layer risk and post-processing needs)
-
Feature accessibility (wire needs a cut path; sinker needs flushing and electrode access)
-
Distortion from heat treat (EDM doesn’t remove distortion—you plan around it)
In other words, EDM expands what you can manufacture, but good DFM and inspection planning still decide whether you hit cost and lead time targets.
Wire EDM explained: best-fit use cases and practical limits
Wire EDM is best when you can define the feature as a 2D profile that cuts through the workpiece. It is widely used for precision hardened steel components, tooling plates, and parts where straightness and profile accuracy matter.

What Wire EDM makes best: profiles, slots, punches, and plates?
Wire EDM uses a continuously fed wire as the electrode. The wire follows a programmed path like a “spark saw,” creating a kerf through the part.
Wire EDM is a strong fit for:
-
Intricate external and internal profiles (through-cut)
-
Tight-fitting punches/dies that need consistent clearance
-
Straight, deep-through slots that would chatter in milling
If your part resembles a “contour cut,” wire EDM often delivers the cleanest route in hardened material.
Constraints: must have a start hole and a cut path
Wire EDM needs a way to thread the wire into the work zone.
That usually means:
-
A start hole (or edge start) so the wire can enter
-
A continuous path for the wire to follow
If your feature is a blind pocket with no way to thread the wire and no exit path, wire EDM is not the right process.

Geometry realities: inside corners, tapers, and small features
Wire EDM can create sharp inside corners compared with milling, but corners still have a practical limit because the wire has a finite diameter.
If you truly need a “knife” corner:
-
First ask whether the corner must be perfectly sharp for function
-
If yes, consider sinker EDM for the corner region, or redesign with a controlled relief
Tapers and angled walls can also be possible with specialized wire setups, but they add complexity. When in doubt, call out the functional requirement (fit, sealing, clearance) rather than an overly strict geometric demand.
Sinker EDM explained: best-fit use cases and practical limits
Sinker EDM is best when you need cavities, blind features, and 3D shapes that are difficult to machine—especially in hardened steel and tooling inserts. It uses a shaped electrode that “burns” the negative of the desired geometry into the workpiece.

How the electrode shapes the cavity?
Sinker EDM starts with an electrode made to the required shape (commonly graphite or copper).
The machine then uses controlled sparks between the electrode and the workpiece to reproduce that geometry in the part.
This is why sinker EDM is common in mold and die work: you can create deep ribs, blind pockets, and crisp details that would be hard to reach with rotating cutters.
Electrode wear and why it matters for accuracy and lead time?
Electrodes wear during EDM.
That affects:
-
Final geometry accuracy (especially on sharp details)
-
Whether multiple electrodes are needed (roughing + finishing)
-
Lead time (electrode manufacturing is part of the schedule)
For purchasing teams, this becomes a quoting question: parts that require multiple electrodes or complex electrode shapes often cost more, even if the part “looks small.”

Where sinker shines: deep ribs, blind details, textures, and tooling inserts?
Sinker EDM is especially useful for:
-
Deep ribs in hardened inserts
-
Blind features with tight corner conditions
-
Tooling details that must stay crisp after heat treat
If you also run die casting, this capability supports faster iteration on inserts and cores, because you can finish the hardest features without forcing the design into “millable only” geometry.
Wire EDM vs Sinker EDM: the differences that drive cost and quality
The biggest difference is simple: wire EDM cuts through; sinker EDM creates cavities. From that, most cost and quality tradeoffs follow—feature access, electrode preparation, flushing, finishing passes, and inspection complexity.
Because EDM creates a thermally affected surface and a recast layer, the “real” cost and risk often show up in post-EDM finishing—for example, wire EDM skim cuts to reduce recast, and sinker finishing burns, followed by polishing or grinding when surface integrity or Ra targets matter. Plan those steps up front as part of your finishing specification and downstream process selection here: post-EDM surface treatment and finishing options
Feature type and access: through-cuts versus cavities
Start by classifying your critical feature:
-
Through-cut outline/slot → Wire EDM
-
Blind pocket/cavity with 3D form → Sinker EDM
Then check access:
-
Wire EDM needs a threading/start strategy.
-
Sinker EDM needs room for the electrode and effective flushing of debris.
If access is poor, cost rises fast. A small design change (adding a relief, widening a channel, changing a corner requirement) can be the difference between a stable process and repeated rework.
Achievable geometry: sharp corners, deep slots, thin walls
EDM helps with geometry that milling struggles with, but each method has its own “reality checks.”
Wire EDM:
-
Strong on straight, deep-through features
-
Inside corners limited by wire size (plan corner reliefs when possible)
Sinker EDM:
-
Strong on deep ribs and blind cavities
-
Electrode design and wear influence how crisp the final details can be
For thin walls, EDM often reduces mechanical deflection risk, but you still need to manage heat and flushing so the feature remains stable.
urface finish and surface integrity: recast layer and finishing steps
EDM creates a thermally affected surface.
Depending on requirements, you may need:
-
Finishing passes (wire skim cuts; sinker finishing burns)
-
Secondary finishing (polish, grind, or light machining where accessible)
If the part is for high-stress or regulated use, discuss surface integrity early. It’s easier to plan the right finishing steps than to discover late that a critical surface needs additional work.

Accuracy, repeatability, and what tolerance strategy does to cost?
EDM can be very accurate, but tighter tolerances typically mean more time and more process control.
To keep quotes predictable:
-
Mark “critical to function” dimensions clearly.
-
Avoid making everything tight by default.
-
Use GD&T/datum schemes that reflect how the part assembles and how it will be inspected.
If you’re unsure which tolerances drive cost most, ask your supplier to propose a tolerance strategy that matches function.
What usually drives lead time: electrodes, skim cuts, inspection, and reporting?
When lead time matters, these are common drivers:
-
Sinker EDM: electrode design and machining, plus potential multiple electrodes
-
Wire EDM: start hole strategy, fixturing, and finishing passes
-
Inspection: CMM time, datum setup, and reporting (FAI requirements)
If you need a fast quote and realistic delivery date, include your target ship date and the inspection/reporting expectations up front.
EDM design cheat sheet: how to make complex features quote cleanly
Design for EDM is mostly about making the feature manufacturable and inspectable. The cheat sheet below maps common “hard features” to the right EDM approach and the drawing notes that avoid rework.
Feature-to-process guide: what to specify and what to avoid
| Feature / Goal | Best-fit method | What to specify in the drawing/RFQ | Common pitfalls to avoid |
|---|---|---|---|
| Complex outline through a plate | Wire EDM | Profile tolerance, datum reference, edge condition | Over-specifying all dimensions; unclear datums |
| Narrow through-slot with straight walls | Wire EDM | Slot width tolerance + which faces are functional | No start hole plan; unrealistic corner sharpness |
| Sharp internal corner needed for fit | Sinker EDM (or hybrid) | Define the functional mating condition; allow relief if possible | Calling “perfectly sharp” without functional reason |
| Deep rib in hardened insert | Sinker EDM | Rib depth/width, draft requirement (if any), functional surfaces | Insufficient flushing access; rib too thin for stability |
| Blind pocket with 3D form | Sinker EDM | 3D model + critical surfaces and tolerances | Missing model; unclear surface finish requirement |
| Thin wall near a deep feature | Wire or Sinker (case-by-case) | Identify CTQ wall thickness; inspection approach | Treating thin walls like normal milling geometry |
| Tight alignment between EDM feature and milled face | Hybrid workflow | Datum scheme that ties EDM and CNC ops together | Datums that shift between operations |
Drawing notes that prevent re-quotes and scrap
Small details in your drawing package can eliminate back-and-forth.
Include:
-
A clear datum scheme (how the part locates in assembly)
-
A short list of critical-to-function dimensions/features
-
Material spec + material condition (soft vs heat treated)
-
Surface finish notes only where they matter (avoid blanket tightness)
If you want the supplier to choose the process, say so. A note like “Supplier may use EDM where required to meet geometry and tolerance” can open better manufacturing options.
Datum strategy and “critical to function” callouts
Inspection is easier when the datums match how the part actually works.
If your critical geometry is a cavity relative to a mounting face, build datums around that relationship. Don’t force the shop to invent a datum scheme, because that often leads to ambiguity and surprises during final inspection.
Where EDM fits in tooling and die casting programs?
EDM is a core enabling process for die casting tooling because it can create deep ribs, sharp internal corners, and hard-to-reach details in hardened mold inserts and cores—features that often become risky or slow once milling runs out of tool access or tool life. If you build aluminum or zinc die casting tools, EDM helps you hold crisp detail and stable geometry where it matters most for part release, sealing, and wear surfaces. For our die casting capability and tooling support, see custom aluminum and zinc die casting parts.
Inserts, cores, deep ribs, vents, and ejector-related details
In tooling work, sinker EDM often supports:
-
Deep ribs and cavities in inserts and cores
-
Tight corner features that affect flash and part release
-
Local detail features that need crisp edges
Wire EDM often supports:
-
Punch/die components and plates
-
Precision profiles and matching components where clearance matters
A proven workflow: rough CNC, heat treat, EDM finishing, final inspection
For tooling inserts and hardened components, this workflow is common:
-
CNC roughing for efficiency
-
Heat treat (when required by wear or load)
-
EDM to finish deep ribs, sharp corners, and blind details
-
Surface treatment/finishing if needed (coatings, polishing, etc.)
-
Final inspection to datums that reflect the mating condition
Inspection and quality control for EDM parts in aerospace and medical
For aerospace and medical buyers, EDM is attractive because it can hit hard geometries, but it raises questions about verification and surface condition. A good supplier will explain how they plan datums, how they verify geometry, and when they recommend finishing steps.
What to inspect first: datums, mating features, and functional surfaces?
Start inspection planning with the features that affect assembly and function:
- Mounting faces and datum features
- Mating profiles and seal/fit surfaces
- Hole patterns or alignment features that locate the part

Then move to deep features that are hard to measure. If those are critical, agree on the measurement plan early—your datum alignment, CMM inspection setup, probing strategy, and any go/no-go gauges—so the inspection report actually reflects how the part locates and functions in the assembly. If you want a reference for how this is typically controlled and documented, see our CNC machining quality control and inspection workflow.
If you’re sourcing regulated parts, call out documentation at RFQ time instead of “sorting it out later.” Ask for a First Article Inspection report (FAI/FAIR), a dimensional inspection report, CTQ or key-characteristic identification, and the traceability package you need (material certs, process records, and inspection results linked back to drawing zones/characteristic IDs). This reduces re-quotes, avoids inspection surprises, and keeps lead time predictable.
When to specify surface integrity concerns and finishing steps?
If a surface is fatigue-critical, sealing-critical, or friction-critical, call that out.
You can request:
-
A finishing strategy on that surface (finishing passes, polish/grind where appropriate)
-
A process plan discussion before production
Avoid vague notes like “best finish everywhere.” Instead, name the surfaces that matter and why.
How to reduce risk on expensive hardened blanks?
Hardened blanks can be expensive to scrap.
To reduce risk:
-
Ask for a short DFM review before finalizing tolerances
-
Consider a pilot quantity for first validation
-
Provide clear acceptance criteria for critical features
If you want a supplier to propose options, include your functional requirements and let them suggest wire vs sinker vs hybrid.
RFQ checklist: what to send your EDM supplier?
A clean RFQ package gets you a faster quote and fewer surprises. For EDM work, the key is to describe function, material condition, and inspection expectations, not just geometry.
CAD and drawing package: what files help most
Send:
-
3D model (STEP recommended)
-
2D drawing (PDF) with tolerances, datums, and notes
-
If applicable: mating part info or an assembly reference that explains the functional relationship
Material condition, heat treat state, and functional requirements
Include:
-
Material grade
-
Whether the part is supplied soft or already heat treated
-
Any functional requirement that drives the geometry (fit, clearance, sealing, load path)
If the heat treat is not fixed yet, say so. Many tooling workflows depend on when heat treat happens.
Tolerances and surface finish: what matters vs what costs money
EDM time often scales with how much “finishing” you demand.
To control cost:
-
Tighten tolerances only on features that control function
-
Use sensible surface finish notes and apply them only where needed
-
Let the supplier propose a finishing approach on non-critical surfaces
A good rule: if you can’t explain why a tolerance is tight, it probably shouldn’t be.
Quantity, delivery target, and FAI requirements
Specify:
-
Quantity (prototype vs production)
-
Target ship date (or priority: cost vs speed)
-
Inspection/reporting needs (dimension list, first article expectations)
If you need a quote quickly, include all of the above in the first email. It avoids “re-quote” cycles.
When EDM is not the best choice and what to use instead?
EDM is a great fit for certain geometries, but it can be the wrong tool when the feature is simple, accessible, and not in a hardened state. In those cases, conventional machining or other processes can be faster and cheaper.
Design tweaks that make CNC milling or turning possible
Before committing to EDM, check if a small design change makes CNC feasible:
-
Add corner radii where possible
-
Increase slot width or reduce depth
-
Split the part into two components that assemble
When grinding, broaching, laser, or waterjet makes more sense?
Depending on geometry and tolerance needs:
-
Grinding can be ideal for flatness or tight size on accessible faces
-
Broaching can be cost-effective for certain internal forms in volume
-
Laser/waterjet can rough profiles before finishing operations
If you’re unsure, the fastest path is often a DFM review that compares options and highlights what drives risk and cost.
FAQ
Can Wire EDM make blind pockets?
No—wire EDM is fundamentally a through-cut process. If you need a blind pocket or cavity, sinker EDM (or a different process) is usually required.
Can Sinker EDM cut through a part?
Sinker EDM is primarily used for cavities, but it can sometimes create through features if the electrode and setup allow it. In most cases, if the intent is a through-cut profile, wire EDM is the cleaner and more predictable choice.
How do I call out sharp internal corners realistically?
First, decide whether the corner must be perfectly sharp for function.
If a tiny relief is acceptable, call it out. If a sharp corner is truly functional, discuss it with your supplier early. Sinker EDM can often produce sharper internal corners than milling, but electrode design and wear still matter.
What files do you need for a quote?
At minimum: a 3D model + a 2D drawing with datums, tolerances, and material condition.
If you have a mating part or assembly context that explains function, include it. It usually improves quoting accuracy and speeds up DFM feedback.
Conclusion
Wire EDM (wire-cut EDM) and sinker EDM (die-sinker EDM) both make complex geometry in hardened tool steel without mechanical cutting forces, but they solve different feature types. Wire EDM is the cleanest choice for accurate through-cut 2D profiles such as outlines, slots, and internal profiles that go all the way through the part. Sinker EDM is the better fit for blind cavities, deep ribs, and 3D details formed by an electrode—especially in mold inserts and hardened tooling components.
In practice, the most predictable results often come from a hybrid CNC plus heat treat plus EDM finishing plan: CNC for efficient material removal, then EDM for the features cutters can’t reach or can’t hold reliably after hardening. To reduce risk and total cost, align the route with your datum scheme and verification plan early—often including CMM inspection and (for regulated programs) a First Article Inspection report that captures measurements, results, and traceability expectations.
If you share your drawing or 3D model, we can review your part and suggest the best process route (wire, sinker, or hybrid) to reduce risk and total cost. Use this form to start: Contact for a Quote.


